Begin with an organized study.
Relevant events, recording limitations, and preliminary findings are assembled before the physician’s read. The aim is less time gathering information and more attention available for interpretation.
Remote EEG review for clinical teams
EEG preliminary
analysis.By a Neuroanalyst.
Start your read with the study prepared.
A reviewed recording, annotated events, and a concise technical report—organized for your independent interpretation.
John Slayden, REEGT, NA-CLTMNeuroanalyst · Retrospective EEG analysis
A physician’s starting pointFictional example
ELECTRO-INTELLIGENCEPRELIMINARY ANALYSIS
24-hour video-EEG
Technical handoffReviewed interval02–03 Nov · 24 hours
Review scopeEEG + event-linked video
Electrode placementInternational 10–20
Technical limitationBrief F7 artifact documented
Start with what was recorded, what was reviewed, and what could limit the interpretation.
01
Two left temporal electroclinical seizures.Source bookmarks: E01 and E03
02
Left anterior temporal sharp waves and intermittent focal slowing.
03
One marked event without an ictal scalp EEG change.
E01 · 02 Nov · 14:18:3274 s · Pattern A
E02 · 02 Nov · 18:06:1022 s · Marked event
E03 · 03 Nov · 03:42:0891 s · Pattern A
Onset, duration, clinical observations, and source bookmarks kept together. Times CST (UTC−6).
Source-linked observations.
Independent physician interpretation.View the full specimen
Independent physician interpretation.View the full specimen
For neurologists, EEG providers, and hospital teamsDefined review scope · Traceable findings · Physician final interpretation
Why add a Neuroanalyst?
There is a lot of work
before the interpretation.
Locating events. Reviewing the surrounding EEG. Reconciling clinical observations. Organizing the findings. A Neuroanalyst takes on that preparation and brings the relevant observations together for your review.
Check an observation at its source.
Timestamps and waveform references connect the written findings to the recording. Event-linked video observations are included when they are part of the agreed review.
Get help with the studies waiting.
Use a defined review engagement for overflow, a backlog, or limited in-house analysis capacity. Agree the volume and turnaround around the work your team needs covered.
What arrives with the study
A handoff built
for physician review.
Enough detail to evaluate the findings. A clear path back to the recording. A report that makes the next person’s work easier.
Prepared by the NeuroanalystWhat it gives the interpreting physician
01
Study context & technical review
The reviewed interval, available history, acquisition and display details, recording quality, and limitations—so the scope of the analysis is clear.
02
Event index & annotations
Relevant events organized by time, duration, pattern, and associated clinical observations, with source references to inspect.
03
Preliminary technical report
A concise account of the background, salient findings, events, and limitations, using terminology and a format agreed with your team.
You retain the recording, the independent review, and the final interpretation.
Inspect the fictional sampleKnow who is reviewing
John Slayden
REEGT, NA-CLTM
Neuroanalyst
Wisconsin, USA · Remote technical review
Advanced EEG review is
the core of this service.
The NA-CLTM credential is an advanced credential for long-term EEG review and preliminary reporting. ABRET describes the role as a physician extender who reviews recordings and prepares detailed findings using standardized terminology.
At Electro-Intelligence, that expertise is applied to a defined task: prepare the study and its technical findings for your reading workflow. The sample lets you inspect the reporting approach; a pilot lets your physician evaluate the actual handoff.
About the NA-CLTM role at ABRETA practical way to begin
Start with a few studies.
Evaluate the work.
A small pilot gives your team something concrete to assess before deciding on ongoing support.
01 / Scope
Choose two to four studies.
Agree the study types, reviewed intervals, reporting format, volume, and turnaround. Receive a quote for that defined scope.
02 / Prepare
Confirm the working setup.
Establish approved access, compatibility, agreements, physician oversight, insurance requirements, and the escalation pathway before review begins.
03 / Evaluate
Judge the handoff in practice.
Your physician assesses clarity, source references, necessary corrections, and whether preparation time is reduced. Use that feedback to decide what comes next.
How does this help if I still need to review the EEG?
The value is in the preparation: the agreed interval has had a technical review, relevant observations are organized, and source references are ready to inspect. You still perform an independent review and interpretation. A pilot should establish whether the handoff reduces preparation work in your particular workflow.
What types of work are a fit?
Retrospective analysis of completed EEG recordings, including long-term and video-EEG studies, subject to the agreed study scope and technical compatibility. Overflow and limited in-house analysis capacity are useful starting points. Continuous surveillance and emergency monitoring are outside this offer.
Can the report follow our existing format?
The reporting structure, terminology, required fields, annotation approach, and delivery method are agreed during scoping. The goal is a handoff that fits your interpreting physician’s process.
What will it cost, and when will the work be ready?
Pricing and turnaround are quoted after reviewing recording length, volume, video requirements, platform access, and reporting needs. Both are agreed before the engagement begins.
Start with a defined scope
Let’s prepare
your next few studies.
Tell us the study type, recording length, volume, and target turnaround. We’ll work through the fit and quote a small pilot.